Alaska is standing on the precipice of one of the most significant economic opportunities in decades. Federal signals favoring resource development have thawed projects long frozen in regulatory ice. The Willow development and the Ambler Access Road are no longer distant hypotheticals but immediate prospects, with combined forecasts projecting up to 17,000 new jobs at peak construction. For a state with fewer than a million residents, that is a surge that can reshape both workforce and economy.

These are not superficial, temporary jobs. They represent the trades, engineering, logistics, and construction roles that anchor healthy, middle-class economies. When combined with the inevitable service sector expansion – fuel stations, hardware stores, grocers, mechanics, and support contractors – the economic ripple is considerable. What happens in the North Slope will not stay in the North Slope; it will reverberate across Fairbanks, the Mat-Su, Kenai, and beyond.

Alaska’s fiscal structure is unique in the Union. There is no state income tax, nor should there be. But prosperity flows through other channels. Large resource projects generate royalties. Increased commerce drives fuel tax receipts, local sales tax, and corporate activity. A workforce that lives and spends in Alaska means economic circulation inside Alaska. In plain terms, this revenue stream could relieve pressure on education funding and protect the full Permanent Fund Dividend from being used as a budgetary stopgap. A well-planned boom could generate not just jobs but a durable economic buffer against fiscal volatility.

But that hinges on one critical, neglected factor: housing.

 The Fly-In Fly-Out Trap

Alaska is already in the throes of a housing shortage. Demand outstrips supply in critical regions – Kenai, Mat-Su, Fairbanks, and project-adjacent communities. Many areas have seen costs rise while availability stagnates. A boom without beds will not result in a growing resident base; it will result in a fly-in, fly-out workforce – a transient labor population that earns Alaskan wages but spends those wages elsewhere.

Workers who live elsewhere don’t invest in local communities. They don’t build generational stability. They don’t buy homes, send their children to local schools, or keep their paychecks circulating through local businesses beyond their per diem spending. The result is simple: the state will bear the impact of the boom but retain only a fraction of the benefit.

The numbers make the risk plain. If thousands of high-wage workers cycle in and out of Alaska rather than settling, projected revenue tied to local commerce could collapse well below potential. Instead of an economic tide lifting communities, we risk a shallow surge – a brief uptick followed by a fiscal ebb, leaving communities no better off than before.

A Land-Rich, Housing-Poor State

This is not a problem of land scarcity. Alaska is land-rich. The state holds vast tracts of land that remain locked away behind layers of bureaucratic process. The irony is palpable: a resource boom may be stifled not by environmentalists or regulators, but by our own inaction.

If the state is to seize this moment rather than watch it pass, it must strategically release state lands for residential development in targeted zones – particularly where resource and infrastructure corridors will drive workforce demand. Doing so is not an invitation to reckless expansion, but to deliberate, high-impact development where it matters most.

Projects like Ambler and Willow will draw workers whether we prepare for them or not. But only intentional policy can determine whether those workers build lives here – or merely pass through.

A Choice with Consequences

This is, at its core, a question of political will. Alaska can either meet opportunity with foresight or allow the status quo to siphon its gains into the Lower 48. Releasing state land for development is neither radical nor experimental – it is a necessary act of stewardship. It means looking beyond the next fiscal year and preparing for the economic architecture of the next generation.

This boom will not wait. If Alaska fails to make room for its own prosperity, someone else will gladly take it home with them.

The views expressed here are those of the author.

Click here to support the Alaska Watchman.