By AlaskaWatchman.com

Rep. Kevin McCabe

Alaska presents the Republican Party with both a challenge and an opportunity. Nearly 60% of Alaska voters are undeclared or nonpartisan, the highest share in the nation. If we want to grow as a party and govern effectively, we must understand how Alaska voters actually make decisions, while holding firm to our core conservative principles.

The Alaska Republican Party is a grassroots organization, built from the bottom up and meant to reflect the American ideal of a party led by the people and accountable to the people. It is not, and should never become, a command-and-control operation where a small group dictates what legislators or districts are allowed to think or do. Its purpose is straightforward: elect conservatives. Doing that requires respecting the political realities of each district, whether solidly red, clearly blue, or somewhere in between, and supporting candidates who can win where they live while advancing conservative policy.

The numbers make this unavoidable. Based on the most recent data from late 2025, Republicans make up roughly one quarter of Alaska’s registered voters. Democrats account for about 12%. Nearly 60% are undeclared or nonpartisan. That is the electorate we are working with. Candidates who rely solely on partisan loyalty or ideological purity will not succeed. Winning requires earning trust beyond the base, especially among voters who may be skeptical of party politics but are open to conservative ideas on energy development, personal freedom and fiscal responsibility.

When politics becomes driven by urgency, fear, and absolute purity, people stop thinking for themselves. That kind of politics benefits activists and power brokers, not voters or communities.

Those voters are not the same everywhere in the state. Many rural and Mat-Su districts have strong conservative majorities focused on resource development, personal freedoms and limited government. Other areas, particularly urban and coastal districts, are more mixed. Voters there may support energy jobs and budget restraint while also valuing stability, subsistence rights, or a less confrontational style of politics. Ignoring these differences, or attempting to impose a single statewide strategy, undermines our ability to compete and win.

This is where Positive Conservatism matters. Our platform is not up for negotiation. Republicans believe in protecting life from conception, defending the Second Amendment, limiting the size and reach of government, balancing budgets, supporting Alaska’s resource economy and responsibly managing Permanent Fund earnings. Those principles are foundational. How we advance them matters. When internal disagreements turn into public shaming, personal attacks or ideological purity tests, the party grows weaker, not stronger.

Alaska’s large nonpartisan electorate is not hostile to conservative ideas. Many already lean conservative on issues such as energy independence, gun rights, personal responsibility, and living within our means. What turns them away is not our values, but how politics is practiced. Voters are wary of national-style outrage politics that demand emotional loyalty, discourage independent thought and treat disagreement as moral failure. That approach may generate attention, but it does not build trust, and it does not work in a state like Alaska.

When politics becomes driven by urgency, fear, and absolute purity, people stop thinking for themselves. That kind of politics benefits activists and power brokers, not voters or communities. Alaska voters, particularly independents and undeclared voters, value judgment, restraint and straight talk. They respond to leaders who can explain their reasoning, acknowledge tradeoffs, and focus on solving real problems rather than fueling constant conflict.

Positive Conservatism offers a better path forward.

When the pursuit of ideological purity becomes the goal, real results are sacrificed.

First, empower local districts. Precincts and district committees know their voters best. In solidly conservative areas, the party should fully support candidates who advance core principles. In competitive districts, it should back pragmatic conservatives who can build durable working relationships around shared priorities such as jobs, infrastructure and cost of living, while steadily moving policy in a conservative direction. The role of the state party is to equip, train and support candidates, not micromanage legislators.

Second, lead with solutions and results. Voters want to see what conservative governance actually delivers. The party must support legislators who focus on energy projects that create jobs, infrastructure that lowers costs and produces positive returns, education reforms that put families first and responsible budgeting that protects dividends without raising taxes. Tangible results matter more than slogans, memes, or bumper stickers.

Third, rebuild trust through competence and honesty. Alaska voters are tired of political grandstanding. They respond to clear explanations, realistic plans and steady leadership. When government falls short, conservatives should offer workable reforms that move toward smaller, more effective government without unnecessary disruption.

Fourth, expand the base without surrendering principles. Districts’ and clubs’ outreach should be welcoming and focused on issues that matter to local communities. Discussions around energy, public safety, education, and cost of living bring in voters who may never attend a partisan rally but care deeply about Alaska’s future. Disagreement should be met with persuasion, not condemnation.

Finally, Republicans must focus on progress rather than perfection. In a divided State Legislature and in a state with mixed political values, meaningful change comes incrementally. Protecting gun rights, supporting small businesses, reducing regulatory burdens and strengthening local control are achieved step-by-step. When the pursuit of ideological purity becomes the goal, real results are sacrificed. Demanding immediate or sweeping reform, and return to purity, is not a path to lasting change. Reluctant conservative voters notice and reward steady, effective leadership that delivers progress over time.

If Republicans in Alaska embrace this bottom-up, positive conservatism, we can grow beyond our narrow base and become a governing majority again. Accountability matters, but it should come through informed debate, voter engagement, and elections, not public humiliation or internal warfare.

The goal is not to win arguments inside the party, but to win elections and advance conservative principles for Alaska’s future.

The views expressed here are those of the author.

Click here to support the Alaska Watchman

REP. MCCABE: Alaska’s GOP won’t grow with public shaming & ideological purity tests

Rep. Kevin McCabe
Rep. Kevin McCabe is a 40-plus-year Alaskan who is the House representative for District 30. He is retired U.S. Coast Guard and a retired airline pilot.


1 Comment

  • Lance says:

    if you reward legislators who don’t stand for conservative principles then you are only incentivizing dishonesty and cowardice . Electing a republican who votes with the dems is no better than electing the dem themselves. You will know them by the fruit on their tree, primarily their vote. Actions speak louder than words. Don’t reward bad behaviour.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *