The Republican Party stands at a critical juncture in understanding its emerging coalition, particularly among young voters. Recent polling data from NBC News reveals a profound shift in how Generation Z defines success – a shift that has significant implications for platform development and campaign strategy in Alaska and beyond.

When examined alongside dramatic evidence of religious revival among young Americans, particularly young men, these trends paint a picture of fundamental realignment in American political and cultural life. The Alaska Republican Party would be wise to recognize these converging patterns and recalibrate its messaging to reflect the authentic values of its growing base of young male voters.

Data Tells a Clear Story

The NBC News Decision Desk Poll, conducted among nearly 3,000 adults aged 18-29 from August 13 through September 1, 2025, reveals stark differences in how young Trump and Harris voters define personal success. Among Gen Z men who voted for President Trump in 2024, having children ranked as the single most important indicator of personal success. In contrast, Gen Z women who voted for Vice President Harris ranked having children as the second-least important factor – 12th out of 13 options provided.

The contrast extends beyond parenthood. Young Trump voters – both men and women – consistently prioritized financial independence, having children, and being spiritually grounded as markers of success. Meanwhile, Harris voters across genders focused on career fulfillment, having money to do desired activities, and for women specifically, emotional stability. This is not merely a gender gap; it represents a fundamental divergence in life philosophy and priorities.

Marriage followed a similar pattern. Gen Z men who voted for Trump ranked marriage as the fourth most important success factor, while Gen Z women who voted for Harris ranked it eleventh. Even among Trump voters, women placed marriage ninth – still significantly higher than their Harris-supporting counterparts but notably lower than Trump-voting men.

Religious Revival Underlying the Political Shift

These family-oriented values cannot be separated from an extraordinary spiritual development: Generation Z and Millennial men are leading an unprecedented return to Christian faith, with Gen Z men showing a 15 percentage point increase in personal commitment to Jesus between 2019 and 2025, and Millennial men experiencing a 19 percentage point increase. This represents one of the most dramatic shifts in American religious patterns in decades.

Barna Group’s 2025 research found that 66% of all U.S. adults now report having made a personal commitment to Jesus that remains important in their lives – a 12 percentage point increase since 2021, when commitment levels had reached their lowest point in three decades. This surge translates to approximately 30 million more Americans who have placed faith at the center of their lives. Critically, this renewal is being led by the young, particularly men, who are now attending weekly religious services at higher rates than Millennials and even some younger Gen X members.

The gender dynamics mirror the political divide precisely. Within older generations, women have consistently been more religious than men, but within Gen Z this gap has closed as young men join churches while young women leave them. Among women ages 18-29, religious unaffiliation increased from 29% in 2013 to 40% in 2024, while men in the same age group remained stable at approximately 35-36%. If current trajectories continue, the historic gender gap in religiosity will completely reverse.

This is not a marginal phenomenon. The decades-long pattern of each generation being less Christian than the previous one has stalled: Americans born in the 1990s are 46% Christian, and Americans born in the 2000s are also 46% Christian – the first time the decline has plateaued. Bible usage among Millennials increased 29% from 2024 to 2025, translating to 10 million more American adults reading Scripture outside of church at least three times yearly.

The implications are profound: young conservative men are not simply adopting political positions about family; they are embracing a comprehensive worldview in which faith, family, and traditional values form an integrated whole. The Trump voters who prioritize having children and being spiritually grounded are often the same young men who have returned to church, committed their lives to Christ, and are seeking meaning beyond career and consumption.

Beyond Politics: A Comprehensive Values Coalition

These findings illuminate something crucial: the Republican coalition increasingly includes young people who embrace what might be termed “generative” values – the belief that personal success involves creating and nurturing the next generation, building stable families, and maintaining spiritual foundations. This stands in sharp contrast to what we might call “individualist achievement” values that prioritize career advancement and personal experience accumulation above family formation.

The religious dimension helps explain why these young conservatives hold these values with such conviction. Research on young male converts to conservative Christianity shows they are seeking structure, stability, and moral order during times of social uncertainty. For these young men, Christianity provides not merely spiritual comfort but a comprehensive framework for understanding human flourishing – one that necessarily includes marriage, children, and intergenerational continuity.

This divide matters for Alaska. Our state has historically valued self-reliance, family, and community – principles that align naturally with the priorities expressed by young Trump voters and with traditional Christian teaching. Alaska’s challenging environment and dispersed population have always demanded strong family units and intergenerational cooperation. The data suggest that young conservatives nationwide are returning to – or perhaps never abandoned – these foundational values, even as their progressive counterparts chart a different course.

Moreover, Alaska’s religious landscape may make the state particularly fertile ground for this emerging coalition. With strong traditions of Christian faith across multiple denominations and a culture that respects religious practice, Alaska can authentically speak to the spiritual yearnings of young people seeking meaning and community.

Strategic Implications for Alaska Republicans

First, the Alaska GOP should resist the temptation to moderate its pro-family, pro-faith platform in an attempt to appeal to young voters broadly. The data demonstrate that young Trump supporters already embrace family-oriented values rooted in religious conviction; diluting this message would alienate an energized base without winning converts from those who fundamentally reject these priorities.

Second, economic messaging must explicitly connect financial policy to family formation. Young Trump voters prioritized both financial independence and having children. Alaska Republicans should emphasize how conservative economic policies – lower taxes, reduced regulation, affordable energy, and job creation – enable young people to achieve the financial stability necessary to start and support families. The state’s unique resource wealth, properly managed, should be framed as a generational asset that allows Alaskans to build prosperous families.

Third, the GOP must develop affirmative pro-natalist policies rather than merely opposing progressive social policies. Young conservatives want to have children; the party should champion policies that make this choice economically feasible and culturally celebrated. This could include expanding child tax credits, supporting affordable housing initiatives for young families, promoting flexible work arrangements that accommodate parenthood, and ensuring quality education options that reflect parental values.

Fourth, spiritual freedom and community support should be central to Republican policy rather than peripheral. The Trump-voting young people who value being “spiritually grounded” as part of their definition of success need a political party that takes their faith seriously. While respecting Alaska’s religious diversity and constitutional constraints, Republicans can support policies that protect religious liberty, safeguard parental rights in education, defend faith-based institutions from ideological pressure, and strengthen community organizations – from churches to volunteer groups – that provide meaning and connection beyond career and consumption.

Fifth, the GOP should directly acknowledge and celebrate the spiritual renewal occurring among young Americans. This is not about imposing religion on anyone; it is about recognizing that millions of young people are freely choosing faith and that their political representatives should respect and support that choice. Alaska Republicans can be explicit: we welcome the young men and women who are returning to church, rediscovering Scripture, and building their lives on transcendent values.

Demographic Reality

Some might argue that focusing on a minority of Gen Z voters – those who supported Trump and embrace Christianity – represents a narrow strategy. This perspective misses three crucial points. First, cultural trends often begin with ideological minorities before spreading more broadly. Young conservatives who prioritize family and faith may represent the early wave of a larger cultural correction as the costs of childlessness, family fragmentation, and spiritual emptiness become clearer.

Second, these young Trump voters are more likely to actually form the families that will constitute Alaska’s future electorate. A significant body of research demonstrates that conservative, religious families have substantially higher fertility rates than progressive, secular ones. Building policy around the values of those most likely to raise the next generation of Alaskans represents sound long-term political strategy, regardless of current generation-wide proportions.

Third, Alaska’s unique demographic and economic circumstances may make the state particularly attractive to young people seeking to build traditional, faith-centered families. Lower population density, abundant natural resources, strong community bonds, a culture that values self-reliance, and respect for religious practice create conditions where family-centered life remains viable in ways that have become prohibitively expensive or culturally unwelcome in urban areas of the Lower 48. Marketing Alaska as a family-friendly, faith-friendly state – in the fullest sense – could attract precisely the demographic that shares Republican values.

The Gender Gap Requires Nuance, Not Abandonment of Principle

The poll reveals a substantial gender gap, with young men more likely than young women to prioritize Trump’s presidency, family formation, and religious faith. Some might counsel abandoning family-focused and faith-friendly messaging to appeal to young women. This would be strategically unwise and philosophically incoherent.

First, even among Trump voters, young women ranked financial independence as their top priority, with marriage and children ranking sixth and ninth respectively – still substantially higher than Harris-supporting women. These priorities are not contradictory; financial independence enables family formation. Republican economic policy that promotes genuine economic opportunity serves both priorities.

Second, the data show that roughly one-third of young women feel anxious “almost all of the time,” with another third anxious “most of the time” – substantially higher than young men. Rather than viewing family-skeptical, faith-dismissive messaging as a solution to female anxiety, Republicans might reasonably argue that the progressive framework itself – emphasizing career achievement, emotional management, and individual fulfillment while devaluing family, faith, and spiritual grounding – contributes to this anxiety epidemic. The solution is not to echo this framework but to offer a coherent alternative.

Third, women who do embrace conservative values, family priorities, and Christian faith deserve political representation that reflects their choices and supports their goals. The Alaska GOP should not abandon this constituency in a likely-futile attempt to win over young women who have fundamentally different priorities and worldviews.

Fourth, the religious data provides grounds for cautious optimism. While young women are currently leaving church at higher rates than young men, the overall stabilization of religious decline suggests the exodus is not infinite. Some young women who currently reject faith and family may, as they mature and as cultural conditions change, reconsider these choices. The Alaska GOP should maintain a consistent message that will be there for them if and when they do.

Political Behavior Follows Worldview

The connection between religious revival and political alignment is neither accidental nor manipulative – it is organic. Young people increasingly view religion as “coded right” and “coded more traditionalist,” and for some young men, Christianity is seen as one institution that is not initially skeptical of them as a class. Put differently, the political left has become so hostile to traditional faith, so dismissive of young men, and so antagonistic toward family formation that young people who value these things naturally gravitate rightward.

This creates extraordinary opportunity for Republicans. Unlike manufactured political coalitions based on transient issues or identity categories, a coalition based on shared transcendent values and commitment to intergenerational flourishing possesses inherent stability. Young men who have committed their lives to Christ, who view marriage and children as core to their identity, and who seek meaning through family and faith are unlikely to be swayed by progressive appeals to individualism and self-actualization.

Furthermore, these voters are likely to be politically engaged in substantive ways. Religious communities provide social capital, organizational infrastructure, and moral frameworks that facilitate political participation. Young conservatives who attend church weekly, read Scripture regularly, and participate in faith communities bring those organizational advantages to their political engagement.

Closing Challenge

The Republican Party has an opportunity to become the explicit party of family, faith, intergenerational continuity, and human flourishing beyond mere economic productivity. The NBC poll demonstrates that this message already resonates with a significant segment of young voters – precisely those most likely to build the families that will shape America’s future. The religious revival data show that these same young people are returning to the Christian faith in numbers not seen in decades, driven by spiritual hunger and the search for meaning in an atomized culture.

Alaska, with its unique culture, resources, and religious traditions, can lead this realignment. The state’s GOP should craft policy and messaging that unashamedly supports family formation, celebrates parenthood, protects religious liberty, enables financial independence in service of family goals, and recognizes that human fulfillment involves more than career achievement and consumption.

This means specific, concrete actions: defending parental rights in education without apology; supporting faith-based social services and community organizations; creating economic conditions where young families can afford homes and children; celebrating Alaska’s religious diversity while acknowledging that Christianity specifically is experiencing extraordinary renewal; and speaking directly to young men who feel their values and aspirations are dismissed or denigrated by progressive culture.

The data is clear. Young conservative men value faith, family, and children. They are returning to church in unprecedented numbers. They are seeking structure, meaning, and transcendence. They voted for Trump not despite these values but because of them. The question is whether Alaska’s Republican leadership will have the courage to build a platform that reflects the authentic convictions of its emerging coalition, even when those convictions diverge sharply from progressive orthodoxy.

The future of Alaska – and the Republican Party – may depend on answering this question correctly. More fundamentally, the flourishing of the rising generation may depend on whether they find political institutions willing to support their choice to build lives centered on faith, family, and service to something greater than themselves.

The views expressed here are those of the author.

Click here to support the Alaska Watchman.