Alaska has been losing people for years, and the trend should alarm every policymaker in this state. Families who once planned to build their futures here now look Outside for affordable energy, reliable schools, and steady jobs. Our outmigration rate remains among the highest in the nation, and it is not the result of chance or bad luck. It is the predictable outcome of a sustained, Outside-funded campaign by environmental extremists who turn every development opportunity into a political battlefield. With each lawsuit, each federal intervention, each new fear-based talking point, another reason to stay in Alaska disappears.

Pebble Mine is the clearest example. It could have delivered billions in economic activity and thousands of high-paying jobs to Southwest Alaska, supporting rural communities that have been begging for stable work for decades. Instead, it became a national fundraising spectacle. Activist groups pressured regulators, filed endless lawsuits, and convinced the EPA to issue a preemptive veto in 2023. Thousands of potential jobs vanished before the project ever had a real chance to prove itself. Pebble has not killed a single salmon yet well continue to allow trawler bycatch to kill them by the millions. The hypocrisy is astounding.

Ambler Road followed the same script: a 211-mile industrial access road to a district packed with copper, zinc, and other minerals the entire country desperately needs for clean-energy technology and national defense. Despite the fact that Federal Law under ANILCA requires this road be developed, a coordinated campaign of litigation and political pressure stalled it until the Trump administration recently revived it. When projects die, people leave. When people leave, schools shrink, costs rise and entire communities contract.

In some villages, households spend 10 % of their income just to keep the lights and heat on.

Now we are watching the identical playbook aimed at the West Susitna Access Project, a modest 78-mile public road that would finally connect the Mat-Su to its own mineral-rich backcountry and give Port MacKenzie the rail and road links it needs to become a real export hub. The latest scare tactic? Claiming the road would hand China a strategic foothold because Nova Minerals, an Australian-listed company with a U.S. subsidiary, holds claims in the area. Even under casual scrutiny, that allegation collapses. Nova’s major shareholders are Western institutions. Substantial-holder notices show zero Chinese state ownership. The old HSBC nominee account that West Susitna Access opponents keep waving around is nothing more than a routine custodian structure, the same kind banks use for millions of investors worldwide. CFIUS already scrutinizes critical-mineral investments like a hawk. If a real red flag ever appeared, the feds would shut it down long before a single ton of ore moved.

The irony is brutal: developing Alaska’s antimony would actually reduce America’s dependence on China, which controls 60–80 % of global supply. Nova’s Estelle project has already received direct federal grants to advance domestic antimony production because Washington sees Alaska as part of the solution. Activists see one more project to kill even if they have to recycle conspiracy theories once the old salmon-based arguments lose their punch.

Meanwhile, regular Alaskans pay the price every single day.

Schools continue to shrink because families simply cannot afford to stay. Anchorage has lost 7,000 students since 2013. Rural districts are consolidating or closing outright. Teachers are laid off. Buildings rot from years of deferred maintenance. Districts stretch limited dollars across enormous geographic areas while trying to keep the lights on and the heat running.

Article VIII of the Alaska Constitution does not suggest we develop our resources for the maximum benefit of the people; it commands it

High energy costs make it even harder to hang on. Alaska’s residential electricity rates run more than 50 % above the national average, 27.71 ¢/kWh and climbing. In some villages, households spend 10 % of their income just to keep the lights and heat on. Environmental lawsuits helped kill the Susitna-Watana hydroelectric project that would have delivered clean, reliable, renewable power to half the Railbelt for the next century at a fraction of today’s cost. The same groups have fought nearly every Cook Inlet gas exploration permit, leaving the region’s natural-gas supply uncertain and pushing the state toward expensive LNG imports. They killed the dam to “save the salmon,” but salmon stocks are crashing anyway, from ocean warming, trawler bycatch, and foreign fleets, while Alaskans get neither fish nor affordable power.

Even when a project finally squeaks through, like Willow, which started producing first oil in late 2025, years of lawsuits and delays mean the jobs and revenue arrive long after families have packed the U-Haul and headed south.

The workers who lose out are not the national activists or the carpet-bagger lawyers cashing six-figure donor checks. They are Alaskans in the Mat-Su, the Interior, and Western Alaska who just want a decent paycheck without being forced to leave the state they love. Subsistence communities get hit the hardest: fewer fish in the river and fewer economic options on shore.

Article VIII of the Alaska Constitution does not suggest we develop our resources for the maximum benefit of the people; it commands it. Building the West Susitna Access Road, finishing the Port MacKenzie rail extension, and responsibly mining our critical minerals fulfill that constitutional duty. They create jobs, lower energy costs, slow outmigration, keep schools open and strengthen national security by reducing reliance on hostile foreign suppliers.

If we continue letting Outside-funded obstruction dictate Alaska’s future the way they did with Susitna-Watana, Pebble, Ambler and dozens of other projects, the Last Frontier will keep shrinking into a museum exhibit; beautiful, empty and irrelevant. Or we can insist on a factual debate and responsible building and give working families a real reason to stay.

The choice is ours. Let’s stop governing by fear and start building again. Let’s tell outside activists – who are only focused on Alaska for the money it brings them – to leave us alone. We can manage our resources without their input, thank you very much.

The views expressed here are those of the author.

Click here to support the Alaska Watchman.