Alaska U.S. Sen. Dan S. Sullivan is pulling no punches when it comes to unmasking an 11th-hour challenger who has the same name, albeit with a different middle initial.
In a recent exclusive interview with CNN’s Manu Raju, the sitting senator accused Democrats of orchestrating a scheme to confuse Alaska voters in order to grease the skids for Democrat challenger Mary Peltola.
Sullivan claimed that both Peltola and U.S. Sen. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer were in on the ploy to run a challenger by the name of Dan. J. Sullivan.
“Schumer has said his path to the majority – majority leader – the ultimate power for him, runs through Alaska,” Sullivan told Raju. “I think the Democrats saw, ‘Hey, geez, Dan Sullivan has got a great record.’ Their opponent, Peltola, doesn’t have anything. Dan Sullivan’s got a real strong vision for Alaska. She doesn’t. Schumer doesn’t. So, it’s not gotten to the point where they want it, so they’re like, now, ‘we’ve got to cheat, so let’s cheat.’”
Sullivan added that this is an extremely serious matter that deserves legal scrutiny.
“Democrats recruited a guy by the name of Dan Sullivan,” he said. “He is a liberal progressive. We’ve seen his donations to all the far-left groups. He’s donated to Peltola. And his whole purpose of running is to confuse Alaskans to make Alaskan voters think that somehow he’s me, so they could rig the vote in favor of Mary Peltola.”
Sullivan noted that his opponent of the same name also filed as a Republican.
ALASKA WATCHMAN DIRECT TO YOUR INBOX
“He’s not a Republican. It’s kind of a joke,” the senator said. “Of course he’s not a Republican, but he filed as a Republican, because he wants Dan Sullivan with an ‘R,’ and I’m Dan Sullivan with the ‘R.’ Everybody knows me as the Republican.”
Sullivan said his last-minute challenger’s entire campaign is “meant to confuse Alaskans.”
“When he filed, his campaign logo, his letterhead, his website, all had my campaign logo, that I’ve had for 13 years,” Sullivan observed. “He stole it … I’d say about 98% similar. Why would he do that? To confuse Alaskans.”
Sullivan called him “the sham candidate” and urged Alaska Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom to remove him from the ballot because the entire candidacy is an attempt to sow mass confusion.
“You don’t have a right to run for office if your primary intent is to confuse the voters and rig the election in favor of someone else.”
Sullivan said that he is prepared to file litigation if the other Sullivan remains on the ballot.
5 Comments
We should all know by now the Democrats are a dirty lot, especially Chuck Schumer. Now we should see Mary Peltola as an accessory to a con-job.
Hey, Dan Sullivan aka YesManDan, it didn’t bother you when you ran you first senatotrial campaign. We thought you were the popular Mayor Dan Sullivan of Anchorage. Turn about is fair play. What good for the gander is good for the goose. We’ll get Susan Collins to write a stern letter to the other Dan Sullivan and Mary Peltola if in fact she is in this diobalical scheme.
“……..We thought you were the popular Mayor Dan Sullivan of Anchorage……….”
Stupidity on your part is no justification for corruption. The former mayor of Anchorage was (and remains) Republican just like our current U.S. Senator. This Mr. Sullivan, reportedly from Petersburg, is not. He changed his party designation upon his filing for candidacy. It’s a clear intent to deceive, investigation is in order, and I hope charges of some kind can be levied. It’s time to broil some goose.
Let’s see if Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom will stand tall for Alaskans, on this issue
Is the Lt. Governor now creating a new standard where any candidate can be forced to prove his subjective “good faith intent” by special affidavit whenever an incumbent or national party complains?
Was this investigation opened because of neutral election-law concerns, or because national Republican/Senate campaign pressure was brought to bear on Alaska’s election office? Only a APRA request will get the answers we all deserve ! Liberty Ed