Anchorage Assembly candidate Liz Vazquez asked the Anchorage Assembly to deny certifying the results of the city’s April 5 election due to violations of city election laws and voter suppression. She is one of three conservative Assembly candidates who lost their elections to leftist Assembly incumbents. Two conservative school board candidates also failed to oust liberal incumbents.

Liz Vazquez

On April 26, the Assembly denied Vazquez’s request and proceeded to certify the election results and swear in the newly elected members.

In a formal report, Vazquez told the city’s election commission on April 25 that they should not recommend that the Assembly certify the election results.

“In one neighborhood at least 25% of the voters had not received their ballots,” Vazquez’s report states. “The Municipal Clerk knew of this by March 31 and took no action to effectively address the disenfranchisement of hundreds or thousands of voters.”

She also noted that there was “possible tampering” by someone using a laptop in the secure area where ballots were processed, and the insertion and retrieval of a thumb drive.

Vazquez said there was a general “lack of effective security, accountability and transparency to ensure voting integrity and provide trust in the election process.”

She stated there were more than 30 complaints filed with the city clerk.

“Two complaints were filed because of statutory violations,” Vazquez wrote. This included the violation of a city ordinance which requires continuous live streaming 24 hours, 7 days per week of election central.

With regard to election security, Vazquez raised serious issues about election central headquarters where ballots are processed and counted.

“A complaint was filed to address this issue because there was no continuous live streaming on Saturdays and Sundays,” Vazquez noted. “During one workweek live streaming varied widely from 9 to 21 hours.”

Additionally, Vazquez claimed another city ordinance was violated when ballots were not mailed out at least 21 days before election day. She observed that there were large clusters of voters who did not receive ballots in the Sand Lake and Jewel Lake areas – locations with a high number of registered Republican voters.

“Finally, it is interesting to note that all complaints were filed by observers on behalf of candidates challenging incumbents,” Vazquez stated. “No complaints were filed by the campaigns of the six incumbent candidates. It should also be noted that there were no observers for the incumbent candidates (there were two Observers that briefly dropped in but did not stay long). Common sense and the facts set forth in this report clearly show there is something wrong with this election and there is sufficient suspicion of the results to deny certification of the results and undertake a hand count.”

In addition to requesting a hand count of the election, Vazquez has asked to be included in an upcoming meeting between the U.S. Post Office and the city clerk to discuss why ballots arrived late in certain areas.

With regard to election security, Vazquez raised serious issues about election central headquarters where ballots are processed and counted.

The candidates should not be penalized for the city’s failure in ensuring voting integrity.

“This area is not effectively secured and is less than twenty feet from the employee area,” she said. “There is no physical separation/barrier between the ‘secured’ area where ballots are processed and the area where employees have their desk, file cabinets, computers, printers, shredders, cell phones and personal belongings, etc.”

Vazquez listed multiple problems, including thousands of blank, returned ballots from the post office that were not properly inventoried or secured.

“During part of the day these blank ballots were on rolling cart shelves and then placed in the same cage as ballots returned by voters,” she stated. “A complaint was filed and as a result, the blank ballots (now over 17,500) were grouped together with cellophane in packets of 250 ballots. After the complaint was filed, these blank ballots were placed in a ‘cage’ that requires a key for entry. However, this inventory is not complete in that a list of the names and addresses on these blank ballots has not been created.”

Vazquez added that, in addition, “hundreds if not thousands of blank ballots were in Election Central without effective security before the complaint was filed and addressed.”

She also highlighted that there were trash containers in the vault where processed ballots were placed.

“It was never fully revealed what was in each of the trash containers on the day they were noticed in the vault,” Vazquez observed. “The observer saw ballot envelopes on top of one of the trash containers. A complaint was filed and the trash containers were removed from the vault.”

With regard to processing ballots that have witness signatures, Vazquez wrote that it came to the attention of one election observer that ballots signed with an ‘X’ and with a witness verification signature were being processed by election employees.

“A complaint was filed and as a result, observers were informed when these ballots were going to be processed and invited to observe,” Vazquez said. “When the observers became involved, they requested verification of the identity of the individuals signing as witnesses. Without the complaint, witness signatures would have remained not identified and verified as registered voters in Alaska. The above are specific examples of very lax and sloppy practices and behavior that result in the lack of effective security.”

Vazquez’s complaint also addressed possible election tampering.

“Aside from the above serious flaws, it appears that there was tampering with the computer and/or software that processes the ballots,” she claimed. “This occurred when an individual with a laptop was observed sitting in the ‘secure’ area. This individual was observed requesting an Election Central employee to insert or provide their computer password. This individual was later identified as an employee of Dominion, the company that provides the ballot processing software/computer. Laptops and electronic equipment are not allowed in the ‘secure’ area and observers and campaigns were never informed that someone would be obtaining access to the software/computer that is processing ballots. On this basis alone the results of this election should be contested.”

Vazquez wanted the city to honor each campaign’s request for a hand recount.

“The cost of this hand count should be the city’s responsibility,” she concluded. “Safeguarding the integrity of elections is an important function of the Assembly, Municipal Clerk and the Election Commission. The candidates should not be penalized for the city’s failure in ensuring voting integrity.”


— Click here to contact the Anchorage Assembly members.

— Click here to read Liz Vazquez’s full report to the election commission.

Click here to support the Alaska Watchman.

Candidate says Anchorage election lacked integrity, suppressed voters

Joel Davidson
Joel is Editor-in-Chief of the Alaska Watchman. Joel is an award winning journalist and has been reporting for over 24 years, He is a proud father of 8 children, and lives in Palmer, Alaska.


  • RL says:

    Go ahead and make preparations to make a legal challenge. The lefties will ignore a formal “request” from anyone challenging their attempts to steal another election.

  • Theresa Bird says:

    This is fascinating, especially in light of the fact that we just received a postcard from the AK Division of Elections informing us of their new BallotTrax offering. The postcard concludes with an implied assurance of the AK Division of Election’s integrity as the purveyor of accurate election information: “With the rise of disinformation and the viral spreading of misinformation, it is important to trust the sources of election information. You can always find accurate information by contacting us or visiting our website…”
    This closing is eerily similar to the banners that appeared for months on YouTube searches, etc, telling us that Joe Biden won the election and that our national elections are fair, etc. following January 6th. It also reminds me of the COVID banners attached to anything on YouTube or Twitter that challenged the White House/Fauci narrative.
    Why didn’t the Division of Elections send out this postcard BEFORE the April 5th election? Why was it sent out after Election Day and before the outcomes are certified? Who runs the AK Division of Elections?

  • Kenneth Wells says:

    There will be no honest elections in Alaska so long as rank choice, electronic ballot machines and mass mail ballots are allowed.