On June 7, Alaska and more than 20 other states that mine coal as an important natural resource, filed a petition in U.S. District Court, District of Washington D.C., asking the court to vacate a recently adopted U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) rule that would severely undercut Alaska’s exclusive jurisdiction over the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations within the state.
“In this new Final Rule, the Secretary is overthrowing a longstanding deference to States on State-regulated mining programs, Alaska Attorney General Treg Taylor said in a prepared statement. “It also seeks to make the federal government the first regulator. But worst of all, it requires the Secretary to ignore vital information from States that could verify or disprove whether violations exist.”
Alaska’s Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources John Boyle noted that Alaska has successfully exercised exclusive jurisdiction and oversight of the state’s coal regulatory program for more than 40 years.
“The DOI’s recently finalized ten-day notice rule subverts and convolutes the state’s preeminent role in overseeing Alaska’s coal industry by allowing those who oppose coal operations to effectively bypass DNR and seek alternative solutions from bureaucrats in Washington D.C.,” he observed. “Yet again, this astonishing example of federal overreach runs counter to the recognition and deference that is given to the States that best possess superior expertise and knowledge of local mining conditions.”
ALASKA WATCHMAN DIRECT TO YOUR INBOX
The DOI Final Rule amends the existing “Ten-Day Notice Rule,” which has always allowed DOI’s Office of Surface Mining (OSM) to become involved if states do not promptly respond to criticisms about coal mining operations or permit compliances. For decades, Alaska has worked cooperatively and successfully with OSM and the public under the rule – responding to notices, working with mine operators, and working with the concerned citizens.
In fact, OSM has praised Alaska for its regulatory practices with respect to both active mines and abandoned mine reclamation (restoration). Yet under the new Final Rule, OSM would prematurely insert itself into Alaska’s response actions, expand the circumstances in which OSM would interject itself and invite citizen complaints without requiring the interested citizen to notify the state.
The new rules, however, make it easier for citizens to go around state authorities to raise complaints about dust, noise, alleged water pollution and much more. If OSM determines there is a reason to believe a violation exists, the federal agency will give notice to the state regulatory authority, which has 10 days to respond back to OSM.
7 Comments
Oil, mining, timber, fishing Alaska has it all. Just get out and vote,
If not and we have four more year of this guy were doomed.
I agree.
Coal is a messy, dirty source of fuel. It should be banned.
jon, quit repeating the lies. People know that you are repeating lies.
I think Jon is right. I’ve researched the impact of coal v other sources of energy and, emissions-wise, coal is the greatest contributor of carbon to our atmosphere. If you believe that increased carbon is irrelevant to climate change, then we’re done here. Might as well believe in ghosts and fairies and demons.
I think Jon is right. I’ve researched the impact of coal v other sources of energy and, emissions-wise, coal is the greatest contributor of carbon to our atmosphere. If you believe that increased carbon is irrelevant to climate change, then we’re done here. Might as well believe in ghosts and fairies and demons.
Hey Friend. Coal is a messy, dirty source of fuel. It should be banned. Not a lie at all. Study the science.