One day after the Alaska Division of Elections certified the general election results, a lawsuit was filed on Dec. 1 in Alaska Superior Court to block Ballot Measure 2, which won by a margin of 50.5% to 49.4%.

The lawsuit is filed against the State of Alaska, the Division of Elections and Lt. Gov. Kevin Meyers in his capacity as supervisor of the elections. It challenges the constitutionality of the ballot measure, claiming it violates free political association, free speech, right to petition, right to due process and “other rights guaranteed” by the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the Alaska Constitution.

Plaintiffs include Libertarian Party candidate Scott Kohlhaas, Alaska Independence Party Chairman Bob Bird and Kenneth Jacobus, a registered Republican who is also the plaintiff’s attorney. Other political parties are invited to join the suit, according to Jacobus.

The only ones who want to change this are the Democrats.

Plaintiff’s Attorney Ken Jacobus

Each of the plaintiffs claim Ballot Measure 2 violates their right to participate in their political party’s selection of candidates by usurping the right of political parties to control the nomination of their candidates and requiring them to participate in a process that violates their right to free political association.

The suit notes that “all political parties” have a right to  “select their candidates in accord with the rules of each party.” This is a right guaranteed by both the U.S. and Alaska constitutions.

At issue is the fact that Ballot Measure 2 creates a mandatory four-winner non-primary election, which does not allow for party primaries. This, the suit states, “creates a system in which political parties are rendered irrelevant and are prevented from selecting their candidates and having their candidates meaningfully identified on the ballots which are provided to the voter.”

It also claims that the ranked-choice voting process disenfranchises voters who only vote for their top candidate rather than ranking their top four choices as Ballot Measure 2 allows.

The lawsuit asks the court to invalidate “all provisions of Proposition 2, and holding that they are of no further force or effect.”

Plaintiff’s attorney Jacobus spoke on the Bird’s Eye View radio show Dec. 1 where he noted that one of the worst parts of Ballot Measure 2 is that it creates a jungle primary that does not let voters know which party candidates are affiliated with.

“The only ones who want to change this are the Democrats,” he said. “I don’t think they would care if people knew (that candidates) were affiliated with them or not.”

Click here to support the Alaska Watchman.

Lawsuit claims Ballot Measure 2 violates U.S. and Alaska constitutions

Joel Davidson
Joel is Editor-in-Chief of the Alaska Watchman. Joel is an award winning journalist and has been reporting for over 24 years, He is a proud father of 8 children, and lives in Palmer, Alaska.


  • SDBound says:

    The voting fraud across the US but also present in Alaska steals just enough votes to make an election close but tilt into whatever it was programmed to favor. Good luck reforming a system that is now election proof.

  • john otness says:

    Those that just say move along that pretend DOMINION is not a factor from the top down are guilty as hell. Treason has that effect,,,She was never supposed to have lost.

  • John Hawkins says:

    I agree wholeheartedly! I hope this lawsuit is successful. How can the average citizen otherwise show support?

  • J.E.T. says:

    The Dominion system here in Alaska, has repeated the same pattern of fraud as the lower 48. But up here I guess our officials are either naive, or they are very trustworthy. Either way, this year, especially on the ultra liberal prop 2, and some Eastside races. I am not trusting these election results. Keven Meyer needs to investigate these allegations of fraud. And Alaska needs to do away with the Dominion system immediately.

    • Rhonda Stark says:

      Agree. Good article, thank you for sharing. I listened to all four hours of the Michigan state house voter fraud investigation hearing yesterday. Pretty compelling evidence. Add in the other several swing states this occurred – investigation merited.

  • Rhonda Stark says:

    It all looks so suspicious. The polls close, ‘live’ voting numbers pour in and Prop 2 is defeated. Then a bizarre new ritual of weeks of mysterious mail in vote counting……and, surprise surprise, the measure wins? And we are simply to accept that? The result should never have been certified. There must be an in-depth forensic investigation. Mail in voting must be stopped and made illegal, and the Dominion voting machines should definitely be questioned.