Feminism 1.0 was in the 19th century, clamoring for the right to vote, own property and hold elective office. In case you didn’t know, it was also strongly anti-abortion. The 2.0 version emerged in the 1960s, and we all know how that went.

But the old 2.0 feminists are discovering the limits to what they can say, and how their movement has been co-opted by the 3.0 feminism and their allies – psychotically deranged and gender-confused men. There is a rough justice being acted out, likely misunderstood except by the most astute social psychologists and spiritual confessors. Men are sick of being used as a punching bag, which has been done through Hollywood, print media, sit-coms, government policy, comics and woke corporations.

For decades now men have been insulted, starting with the shopworn insult of “male chauvinist pig” in the 60s and 70s. But without a Christian grounding, this injustice is going off the rails on a subliminally dangerous tangent.

No, men are not marching down state capitals and the Washington Mall with hard-hats, Popeye muscles and tattoos. That would be too obvious. What they have done is so absurdly childish, it can only be satanic.

With a Trans Day of Vengeance slated for April 1 in Washington, and Tennessee a target for passing legislation to prevent child mutilation, these events are not coincidences.

Rather, they are pretending to be women. They have taken the cue that women cannot be touched, along with certain fashionable racial minorities, which are being invented with new terms almost daily, such as “Latinx,” a term which is detested by most Latinos.

So now these biological men have stolen an authentic justice that emerged from 20th century feminism: women’s sports. Men are also demanding entrance into women’s restrooms where they have full view of women and young girls. They are enlisting the new 3.0 feminists, at least for now, who are too naive to realize how they are being used.

And, they are dangerous. In New Zealand, an angry mob came close to gang-murdering feminist Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull , who came to speak out on behalf of the Old Feminism. The New Zealand government admitted her into their country, with regret, calling her views “despicable,” and basically encouraging mob violence. “Let Women Speak,” which she represents, has its limits, and she found out that men, pretending to be women, have a strength that can lead to confrontations which are similar to getting too close to a tornado.

Then we have NPR, that bastion of a dry, cutting-edge, taxpayer-supported and pseudo-intellectual liberalism, running segments of how the “trans” movement is arming itself with guns, for self-defense. It’s called “Rainbow Re-load,” naturally. These imaginary threats are likely concocted in editorial conference rooms, then on cue are given a fake legitimacy by dutiful and ambitious reporters.

So, in the report we can hear these trans-people chattering away with semi-automatic rifles on Saturday mornings, sharpening up their inner-male, and blazing away at silhouetted targets, perhaps of Archie Bunker, Donald Trump or Mother Teresa. It must feel good.

Now we have the Nashville Shooter, who just took out three little children and three staff members at a Christian school. The mainstream media is, predictably, citing this as another reason for gun control, but they perhaps missed the NPR segment.

More importantly, they are intentionally shielding us from the full contents of the terrorist’s “manifesto,” which will explain the purpose and justification for the crime. That much we know from the murderer’s own last messages. Yet that paragon of faked stupidity and ignorance, Merrick Garland, tells us that they are still working on whether or not this is a hate crime. No doubt the government bureaucrats are trying to decide if they want to lose the manifesto, hope it goes into a memory hole, or doctor it.

The sexual identity of this angry female murderer was confusing to nail down. This occurred because the politically correct editors observe the absurd courtesies that emanate from the various trans AP media guides. These are a jumble of cutting-edge and ever-changing psycho-babble, instructing us on how to talk to avoid giving offense. I felt oiled and dirty just visiting their sites. Even the NY Times could not make up its mind, and ended up apologizing for (correctly) identifying the terrorist as a female.

And, to no one’s surprise, the mainstream media is victimizing the alphabet community by saying that the Nashville attack has endangered them … through imaginary retribution and “hate speech.” If your mind feels tangled up trying to make sense of all this, think how their own must operate.

With a Trans Day of Vengeance slated for April 1 in Washington, and Tennessee a target for passing legislation to prevent child mutilation, these events are not coincidences. Imagine what would be going on in Washington if there was a MAGA rally a week after a redneck had attacked a liberal school in Manhattan.

If Donald Trump was responsible for egging on January 6, some people might finger NPR as an instigator of mass murder. After all, the guilt-by-association card is part of the Left’s playbook. Since they have promoted conservative “hate speech” as worthy of punishment, NPR’s dilemma is going to require a lot of difficult squirming.

The views expressed here are those of the author.

Click here to support the Alaska Watchman.

OPINION: The violent morphing of Feminism 3.0

Bob Bird
Bob Bird ran for U.S. Senate in 1990 and 2008. He is a past president of Alaska Right to Life, a 47-year Alaska resident and a retired public school teacher. He has a passion for studying and teaching Alaska and U.S. constitutional history. He lives on the Kenai Peninsula and is currently a daily radio talk-show host for The Talk of the Kenai, on KSRM 920 AM from 3-5 pm and heard online


  • DaveMaxwell says:

    Excellent comments Bob! Where is our governors responsibility in all this? Our state is also creating this confusion through legislation and our very own providence hospital by providing trans drugs to children! Aren’t we in the process of making trans terrorist ? Obliterating identities of children who end up so confused that the very subject of the value of life itself becomes obsolete?????

  • Lucinda says:

    That wasn’t Bird’s most absurd opinion piece.

    • Friend of Humanity says:

      Lucinda, congratulations on being the first to get a comment posted. Why do not you expand on your opinion and tells us which one was and why you feel this is so. I’d be interested in reading your well-thought-out expanded comments.

      • Lucinda says:

        Yeah, fair enough. I should back up my statement, but I’ ve invited some Satanists over to the compound that my wife and I operate for a three day retreat during which we will invoke Soros, Biden and the anchorage assembly to apply a curse on fundamentalist Christians.

      • Steve Peterson says:

        “Lucinda” has no life except that of a troll. Lefties are like that. Funny, few conservatives go to lefty sites to troll, but lefties just can’t stay away from conservative sites. It is part of their death culture mission.

  • Tamra Nygaard says:

    Seems to me that the violence is all one way, and is composed of unhinged men pretending to be women and violently lashing out at those who know and speak the truth. Sodom and Gomorrah were perhaps less twisted than that, and look what became of those sinners. And honestly, there is nothing more insulting to women than fat, useless men pretending they are women and acting like whores and expecting to be treated like the Queen of England.

    • TheHarshTasteOfReality says:

      Funny how you cite Sodom and Gomorrah in your argument. Was is less twisted then Lot getting drunk and sleeping with his daughters so that he may have a male heir? I would definitely say that it is insulting to women.

      • Tamra Nygaard says:

        I see. So the sins of one man mean the sins of Sodom and Gomorrah are just fine? What, precisely, is your argument here? That homosexuality is as bad as incest? Oddly, in that we agree.

      • Friend of Humanity says:

        The story in the bible about Lot and his daughters is pretty plainly written. You should go read it because you will discover that you are not accurate in your description of what happened.

  • Friend of Humanity says:

    Interesting comments about 3.0 feminism Bob. I had not thought of it that way, but it sounds right. I find this really interesting that, once again, the left is showing premeditated planning for certain events that they will never be arrested for. Once again, innocent people might become injured or die due to the left’s premeditated actions, or lose thousands of dollars of property due to the left’s way of “protesting peacefully.” Going to be interesting days ahead. No matter what, we cannot give in to the “temper tantrums” or “intentional violent threats” that they will use to try to get us to cave in and bow to them.

  • Sterling Crone says:

    Remember a decade or so ago when the shift of speaking a basic truth became verboten as “politically incorrect”? Those who resisted the subterfuge then, are now helpless in the wake of violent blowback by a couple generations of fully entrained humans seemingly from another world. And further, we see them supported by the same subset of humans in our systems legal, judicial, educational, medical, governmental and social . 3.0 indeed.

  • Me says:

    if your poor little mind feels ‘tangled up’ that just means you’re an idiot, sorry.

  • Now We Are Two says:

    “2.0 feminists are discovering the limits…rough justice being acted out…Men are sick of being used…”
    A very good article, even if a bit tame. My view? The average woman today (even the so-called conservative woman) is just a feminist “aping” masculinity and expecting men to affirm them. There is nothing more pathetic (or biologically weird) than a normal woman trying to play football, play hockey, box, power-lift, or even play basketball. Sure, if everyone wants to gender-bend, go for it! Let men wear a skirt and women play football. expect me to mock you both. In fact, I say let women and men compete against one another in very sport, like we do in chess (even though women can’t compete there either). Let women find a sports or activities more in line with their biology where they CAN compete against men. So I don’t feel any sympathy for women here facing this rough justice. As a man, I’ll be standing ready to defend women when they start acting like women. But I’m not holding my breath.

  • jon says:

    I fully support transgender youth and adults, but I don’t believe transgender men should compete in women’s sports. You know that nobody talks about transgender men in sports, why? because the former women are weaker than men. I think transgenders should have their own sports leagues.

  • Penny Johnson says:

    I suppose everyone should ask ChatGPT how to break a Marxist revolution. So many comments, so little true effort, even less time. It’s midnight.

  • Steve Peterson says:

    Great post Bob Bird. You hit the bulls eye yet again.

  • Independent Observer says:

    As an aside; given the fact that the Nashville Shooter was undergoing treatment for a “mental health issue,” and given that anyone feeling compelled to alter their biologic gender through surgical or therapy enhancement and still not accomplish more than an outward result, I believe to suffer from mental illness, thus unqualified from purchasing a firearm – among whom the red flag law sales pitch was intended. I guess the question is not addressed by the psychotherapist regarding whether one owns firearms before or during this process or this mental reset.

    • Friend of Humanity says:

      I agree!

    • Lucinda says:

      I agree that transgenderism is a mental illness and I’ll bet a supremely uncomfortable, painful and suicidally deadly one. I agree that s/he should have been barred from gun ownership. Red flag laws may have worked here. But of course, definitions of mental illness would be critical in this.

      I’ve endured depression all my life, yet I believe I’m fully competent to handle a weapon. Where would I fit into the definitions?