By AlaskaWatchman.com

On Nov. 5, Alaskans will vote to either retain or remove 19 judges from across the state. Thanks to current state law, these periodic retention elections are the only time residents have any say over who sits on the bench. Unfortunately, most voters know very little of the judges before they head to the polls.

The notoriously liberal Alaska Judicial Council recommends Alaskans vote to keep all 19 judges. Their voter guide, however, focuses on generic qualities such as temperament, fairness and knowledge of the law, while failing to give voters details about judges affiliations and past rulings.

In an effort to assist Alaskans in casting their votes, the Alaska Watchman has compiled some additional background information on 8 of the 19 judges up for retention. This is by no means exhaustive, and in some cases we were only able to find a few details to assist voters in making a decision. The information below comes from judges’ applications to serve on the bench along with research into their past rulings and affiliations. There is considerably more information on some judges than others. Behind each name we include our recommendation.

We have provided no recommendation on 11 judges, simply because there was very little helpful information on which to make a judgement.

ALASKA SUPREME COURT JUDGE DARIO BORGHESAN (VOTE NO)

Appointed by Gov. Mike Dunleavy in 2020, Borghesan once worked for the far-left ACLU of Michigan in 2007.

As a sitting Alaska Supreme Court Justice, he voted to uphold the state’s claim that it had the right to forcibly capture, handcuff, isolate and quarantine a Bethel man who tested positive for Covid in October of 2020. That same year, he voted to uphold a lower court ruling against Alaska’s law that seeks to maintain the integrity of absentee voting by requiring the signature of one witness to verify the identity of the absentee voter. The ruling ordered the state to abandon its long-standing practice of requiring an absentee voter to sign their ballot in the presence of someone who is age 18 years or older and to have that person sign as a witness to attest to the identity of the voter.

ALASKA SUPREME COURT JUDGE JENNIFER STUART HENDERSON (VOTE NO)

Judge Henderson ruled in favor of the ACLU lawsuit against Governor Mike Dunleavy’s veto of $334,700 from the Alaska Court System after the Alaska Supreme Court ordered the state to pay that amount for publicly funded abortions. She ruled against the state’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit. By doing so, she implied that the court actually has the power to declare that the governor’s line-item veto is unconstitutional, and that the judicial branch of government actually has the power to order a restoration of funds to its own budget, an act which is constitutionally delegated only to the Legislature.

While studying at Yale Law, she was the editor of the liberal Yale Journal of Law & Feminism. Her personal references when applying for the Superior Court included Rep. Lindsey Holmes (former pro-abortion legislator) and James Torgerson (a former Bar member of the Alaska Judicial Council, and the husband of Judge Morgan Christen, the Obama-appointed judge on the 9th Circuit, who once served as a Board member for Planned Parenthood of Alaska.

SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE ADOLF ZEMAN, Anchorage (VOTE NO)

Judge Adolf Zeman issued a ruling this past April which threatened to undermine the state’s popular homeschool allotment program. While his erroneous ruling was eventually rejected and overturned by the Alaska Supreme Court, it created massive confusion and instability for roughly 24,000 students and their families just months before the start of the current school year.

In correcting Zeman’s flawed decision, the Supreme Court rejected his claim that the state’s entire homeschool allotment program should be discarded because some families use the funding to provide their children with educational opportunities at private or religious schools.

Zeman claimed it was unconstitutional to spend public funds at private or religious educational intuitions or organizations, because the Alaska Constitution forbids the use of public funds for the “direct benefit” of such entities.

Defenders of the homeschool program argued that the allotments only “indirectly” benefit private and religious schools, since the money is given to the parents, who could have spent the funds in myriad ways. They compared it to families who may decide to spend part of their annual Permanent Fund Dividend money on such schools.

DISTRICT COURT JUDGE LESLIE DICKSON, Anchorage (VOTE NO)

Judge Dickson has worked for the radical legal activist group ACLU on its Prisoner Assistant Project.

One of her most public decisions came in 2019 when she fined Anchorage Grubstake Auction owner Ron Alleva $6,500 for using pool cleaner on a site used by homeless people at the border of his property. Dickson also ordered Grubstake Auction, to pay a $35,000 fine. Alleva is a longtime critic of Anchorage’s failed homeless policy. He said he was trying to clean up human feces, vomit and rotting food along his property line.

DISTRICT COURT JUDGE KARI MCCREA, Anchorage (VOTE NO)

Judge McCrea served as the Fairness Diversity and Equality Committee Chair, a program of the Alaska Supreme Court which promotes diversity in its many forms. She also served as a board member for the YWCA of Alaska which partners with Planned Parenthood and LGBTQ activist groups in Alaska.

DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DAVID WALLACE, Anchorage (VOTE YES)

Judge Wallace has served on the school board for Grace Christian School in Anchorage and has also served on the board of a Christian-based nonprofit called RightWay Automotive. That group assists those in need with auto repairs.

DISTRICT COURT JUDGE PAMELA WASHINGTON, Anchorage (VOTE YES)

Judge Washington has served as vice chairman for the pro-life Crisis Pregnancy Center in Anchorage, which provides women with pro-life alternatives to abortion. Washington has also been a volunteer with Faith Christian Community, a faith-based outreach to inmates in Alaska.

COURT OF APPEALS JUDGE TIMOTHY TERRELL (VOTE YES)

Judge Timothy Terrell is an active member of St. John Orthodox Cathedral in Eagle River, and a lifetime member of the Order of St. Ignatius, an organization that supports charitable works of the church. He has also volunteered at the conservative, faith-based Anchorage Gospel Rescue Center, as well as the pro-life Pregnancy Resource Center in Anchorage.

Click here to support Alaska Watchman reporting.

Alaska Watchman advice on voting for or against 8 Alaska judges

Joel Davidson
Joel is Editor-in-Chief of the Alaska Watchman. Joel is an award winning journalist and has been reporting for over 24 years, He is a proud father of 8 children, and lives in Palmer, Alaska.


5 Comments

  • Diana says:

    Vote NO on all of the judges. The public had nothing to do with the hiring and retention or competencies of background investigations. VOTE NO!!!!

  • Mrs Smithson says:

    I voted yes for all but 2.

  • Kathy says:

    Justice is meant to be blind, and judges are meant to be fair – not to uphold your personal beliefs, or mine, but apply the law equally and without bias to the cases before them. The Alaska Judicial Council does exhaustive surveys to see how law enforcement, other officers of the court, and juries rank the judges. The criteria on whether or not to vote a judge should not be, “did I like his/her ruling or does his/her private life indicate that s/he doesn’t hold my same beliefs,” but were the cases before them treated fairly. I personally agreed with Zeman’s ruling – the Alaska Constitution clearly states that Alaska funds should not benefit private and religious organizations. But, you know what? The Alaska Supreme Court overturned his ruling so that is now the law of the land. This is why the courts are structured the way they are – for checks and balances. The only thing that should be considered when voting for a judge is is the judge fair? BTW, Watchman, shame on you for the ‘Adolf’ ads on your site.

  • BackcountryBoy says:

    Joel, I appreciate the recommendations. Unfortunately most of my family and extended family has already voted before this information came out. Maybe in future elections this feedback could be published a month or two in advance?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *