Sen. Bill Wielechowski’s prosecutorial grilling of Alaska’s Acting Attorney General Stephen Cox perfectly encapsulated the lunatic asylum that the Democratic Party has become. It has taken me several days to fully digest the constitutional nonsense that permeates both of these men, and reveals the general misunderstanding of the American civic discourse. And I might add, the nursery that feeds it … LAW SCHOOLS, which teach that case law supersedes all else.

Cox had the chance to shatter Wielechowski’s junior high school knowledge of the state and federal constitutions, but instead soaped his replies with cautionary statements that allows both his allies and enemies to read between the lines. Cox said that the state (meaning the Department of Justice that he leads), has “no current plans” to join any other state A.G.’s in requesting that the U.S. Supreme Court overturn the Obergefell same-sex “marriage” decision. This ill-begotten decision rates right up there with Roe v. Wade, wiping out Alaska and other states’ statutory and constitutional definitions of marriage as being between “one man and one woman.”

Cox’s reply of “no current plans” also pertains to the myriad ways that the state judiciary has overthrown the constitution in fundamental ways. All in regard to “privacy” and abortion, the Alaskan judiciary has stolen vitally basic powers from Alaska’s executive and legislative branches. And as we all know by now, the Grand Jury powers of the people.

“We should like to stop baby-killing, Sen. Wielechowski, but if such is not your pleasure, we will happily continue with the status quo.”

That pretty much sums up the Dunleavy record on the most hideous, barbaric and wicked issue in the history of the world. An issue that has piled up more bodies than all wars and genocides combined since recorded history began.

Let’s investigate how Wielechowski’s own inconsistencies, delivered in the same speech, come back to bite him in his buns, like a terrier holding on to the pants of the postman. With all good Democrats, abortion is the party’s Crown Jewel and must be defended with full-throated courage.

However, they have inconveniently lost the safety net of Roe v. Wade. The Dobbs decision (which overthrew Roe) demonstrated the utterly false idea that the judiciary can invent new rights, rights that are labeled “constitutional,” but cannot be found anywhere in either the federal or state documents. Instead, they must rely on case law, the lowest and flimsiest basis for law. Dobbs proved that, which blew away the fake “constitutional” right to abortion that was loudly proclaimed for 49 years.

But now Alaska’s Democrats still have the local judiciary’s case law, resting on construction surrounding Article 1, Section 22 of our State Constitution:

The right to privacy is recognized, and shall not be infringed. The legislature shall implement this section.

Bring photos of late-term aborted babies, place them on an easel, and say, “THIS, Mr. Wielechowski, is the fruit of your slavish handiwork, the work of your party and your coalition of RINOs.

Umm, let’s see. Wielechowski reaches for a federal right, which was invented by case law, was never found in the constitution, and no longer stands. So, then he supports the overthrow of the State Constitution, where it can be found, in that the parameters of privacy are not within the domain of the judiciary, but in the legislature’s!

You see why the Democratic Party is stark, raving MAD?

Mr. Cox, I’m afraid you are not going to get beyond acting attorney general, just like what happened to the late, great Wayne Anthony Ross, appointed by Sarah Palin. He gave much stronger responses. So, whether you throw the pie right back into Wielechowski’s face, or simply try to dodge it, you likely are toast.

So – learn this, all you prolife politicians out there. If you are going to face these modern-day asylum dwellers, who glorify shedding innocent blood and homosexual marriage as a sacrament that must be defended to appease their false gods, go down with your guns blazing.

Bring photos of late-term aborted babies, place them on an easel, and say, “THIS, Mr. Wielechowski, is the fruit of your slavish handiwork, the work of your party and your coalition of RINOs. Make me attorney general and I will recommend that the governor wield Article 3, Section 16, first to return to the State Legislature the power to define privacy, next to allow the Legislature to end abortion funding, and lastly – to refuse enforcement of the 1970 law that legalized child slaughter.

“After all, I can read the State Constitution, too. And here is what it says in its very first breath: § 1. Inherent Rights. This constitution is dedicated to the principles that all persons have a natural right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness …

“It doesn’t say only BORN persons. As we all know, the unborn child already has property rights and rights to inheritance, recognized since before statehood, even before the U.S. Constitution, and in common law.

“You, sir, who make a career with a party that supposedly promotes people over property, live in a world of obvious inconsistency. You place the unborn child’s property rights over their human rights. How long did you think we could ignore this monstrous travesty? You jam square pegs into round holes, proclaim a perfect fit, and expect everyone to applaud you for it.”

Unrealistic that this would happen? Sure. But somehow, the first step must be taken, to prick the conscience of citizens, which have lain dormant because of the failures of the Christian Church to effectively evangelize our culture.

The views expressed here are those of the author.

Click here to support the Alaska Watchman.