After hearing nearly two hours of testimony overwhelmingly in support of repealing a highly controversial law that restricted and regulated gun ranges, the Mat-Su Borough Assembly unanimously ditched the divisive legislation at its March 15 meeting.

A man prepares to testify before the Mat-Su Borough Assembly on March 15.

The hotly contested law was narrowly approved in February of 2020 on a 4-3 vote. Current Assembly Members Stephanie Nowers and Tim Hale initially voted in favor of it. The other two supporters – Dan Mayfield and Tam Boeve – are no longer on the Assembly.

For more than two years, the issue has drawn contentious public testimonies, warning that the imposition of new and extensive permitting processes, which included filing fees, site plans, civil engineering certifications and environmental stewardship strategies, would result in future gun range applications being denied and thereby restrict residents’ ability to safely use their firearms. Opponents have also expressed concern about the long-term viability of ranges deemed non-compliant with what they see as overly burdensome restrictions.

Supporters of increased regulations, however, claimed they were needed in order to avoid new shooting ranges near existing residential homes, where they fear noise pollution and stray bullets. Others said these concerns are already addressed in Borough code.

Rick McClure, president of Alaska Gun Rights, echoed the opinion of many who favored repealing the law.

“We need more gun ranges built to increase the safe handling and training of future hunters, marksmen and firearm enthusiasts. Not less,” he said in a column published shortly before the vote. “When we repeal the red-tape range restrictions at the borough level, one of many hurdles that gun ranges have to jump through to become a reality will be removed. Repealing this red tape will also protect the existing gun ranges from being strangled out of existence in the future!”

The Assembly chambers broke into applause on March 15 when the ordinance was unanimously scraped.

Click here to support Alaska Watchman reporting.

Mat-Su Borough unanimously ditches restrictive gun range law

Joel Davidson
Joel is Editor-in-Chief of the Alaska Watchman. Joel is an award winning journalist and has been reporting for over 24 years, He is a proud father of 8 children, and lives in Palmer, Alaska.


  • Dan D says:

    congratulations to responsible shooters.

  • Neil DeWitt says:

    I’m glad to hear at lease the Mat Su bought has finally come to their senses. This will allow people to teach and show their children how to safely handle a weapon. Good job assembly members!

  • Elizabeth Henry says:

    Good news! Thank you Anchorage assembly! Gun ranges mean people are practicing and using safe handling. They can mean classes and shooting clubs and improved safety. As for noise there are ways to lessen the sound and also have specific hours.

  • Mark Gordon says:

    So who is going to build and operate these ranges? And where?

  • Warren Keogh says:

    Sadly, the gun range ordinance ordinance was repealed by a unanimous vote of the Assembly. The Assembly threw the baby out with bath water. Gun ranges can now be developed willy-nilly around the Borough. Those who successfully and intentionally confused land use, public process, and public safety/health with 2nd amendment rights are all atwitter. This matter will return to the Assembly via angry residents as soon as the first gun range goes in close to a subdivision who have to endure endless shooting, noise, and a loss of residential property value. This situation is sadly reminiscent of the time the Assembly repealed the Tall Tower ordinance in 2011(?). Cell towers sprouted like mushrooms, heaps of residents were outraged, and 1 2/2 years later the Assembly had to reinstitute another Tall Tower ordinance. The Assembly blundered then and it blunders now. So says this former NRA range safety officer and former Assemblyman…. the sole Assemblyman who voted no on the Tall tower repeal a decade ago.