By AlaskaWatchman.com

While the Alaska House once again passed a budget banning Alaska from using state funds to cover the killing of unborn Alaskans through abortion, it rejected an amendment that would have imposed stiff financial penalties on state health commissioners and administrators if they violate the law and pay for abortions anyway.

Rep. Christopher Kurka (R-Wasilla)

Every year, the Legislature passes a budget which explicitly states that no money from the budget can be used to pay for abortion. Each year, however, the executive branch ignores this language and uses state Medicaid funds to pay for abortions anyway. Last year Alaska paid for nearly 44% of all abortions through the state-funded Medicaid program. Total abortions funded by the state last year totaled 537.

The excuse offered for ignoring the Legislature, which constitutionally controls the state’s purse strings, is that the Alaska Supreme Court has demanded that the state cover abortion. No governor has been willing to side with the Legislature on this issue, including Gov. Mike Dunleavy and other Republican governors. If a governor did follow the Legislature’s direction, there would be no way for the Supreme Court to enforce its “opinion” that the state fund abortion.

Initially, Rep. Christopher Kurka (R-Wasilla) was able to get his amendment banning state-funded abortion passed on a 21 to 18 vote. Every House Republican, except for Speaker Louise Stutes and Rep. Ivy Spohnholz (excused) voted for the amendment, as did “Not Affiliated” Josiah Patkotak. All Democrats and other “Not Affiliated” representatives were opposed.

VOTE TALLY:

YEAS: Ben Carpenter, Mike Cronk, David Eastman, Ron Gillham, DeLena Johnson, James Kaufman, Christopher Kurka, Bart LeBon, Kevin McCabe, Ken McCarty, Tom McKay, Kelly Merrick, David Nelson, Josiah Patkotak, Mike Prax, Sara Rasmussen, George Rauscher, Laddie Shaw, Steve Thompson, Cathy Tilton and Sarah Vance.

NAYS: Matt Claman, Harriet Drummond, Brice Edgmon, Zack Fields, Neal Foster, Sara Hannan, Grier Hopkins, Andy Josephson, Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins, Dan Ortiz, Calvin Schrage, Liz Snyder, Andi Story, Louise Stutes, Geran Tarr, Chris Tuck, Adam Wool, Tiffany Zulkosky                                                                                                           

EXCUSED:  Spohnholz                                                                                                            

But moments after voting to successfully exclude abortion funding from the budget, most House Republicans then voted against providing strong penalties for state employees who ignore the law.

Kurka introduced Amendment 45, which states: “If the Department of Health pays for abortion or abortion-related services, the appropriation made from the general fund to the Department of Health, departmental support services, commissioner’s office, for the salaries of the commissioner and deputy commissioner of health and social services is reduced by $215,713.”

Kurka asked for “unanimous consent” that his amendment be adopted, but Rep. McCabe (R-Big Lake) countered by asking the body to table and thereby effectively kill the amendment without having to actually vote against it.

McCabe told the Watchman that he voted to table the penalty amendment because, ultimately the original abortion funding restriction is not really enforceable anyway. He said it would be better to craft a separate bill to ban public funding of abortion and then let the measure go before the courts.

He also said the amendment that creates a penalty for violating the abortion funding prohibition might run afoul of the State Constitution. McCabe cited a memo from the Legislature’s legal department which claimed that removing funding from executive branch employees for violating the intent of a budget “might” be seen by a court as the Legislature trying to unlawfully administer an executive branch program.

Lawmakers ultimately voted 35 to 5 to table the penalty associated with violating the budget. The only lawmakers who opposed tabling were Eastman, Kurka, Rauscher and Tarr.

Despite voting to table the penalty, the amendment itself still requires the executive branch to violate the budget, as written, if the executive branch goes ahead and once again adheres to the Supreme Court’s demands that Alaska publicly fund abortion.

“The amendment was a binding abortion defunding measure,” Kurka stated on April 6. “The State of Alaska should not pay one penny to kill our most vulnerable. Today I was pleased to be the voice of these little ones and to have a majority support for this measure.”

The House budget is now before the Senate. If it passes the Senate unchanged, it will head to Gov. Dunleavy’s desk to be signed into law.

TAKING ACTION

— Click here to contact representatives in the Alaska House.

— Click here to contact members of the Alaska Senate.

Click here to support Alaska Watchman reporting.

Alaska House bans public funding of abortion, but rejects stiff penalties for violations

Joel Davidson
Joel is Editor-in-Chief of the Alaska Watchman. Joel is an award winning journalist and has been reporting for over 24 years, He is a proud father of 8 children, and lives in Palmer, Alaska.