The Ketchikan Borough Assembly voted to override Mayor Rodney Dial’s veto of a resolution it passed on Aug. 17 which asks the Alaska Legislature to pass a law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity or expression throughout the state.

Ketchikan mayor
Ketchikan Borough Mayor Rodney Dail

Immediately before the Sept. 8 to override his veto, Dial urged the Assembly to think twice about asking the state to implement a law that could lead to overt persecution of Christians and other people of faith. He noted that the resolution requests the state to require private businesses and other groups to violate their deeply held religious beliefs regarding human sexuality when operating in the public square. The resolution calls for a law that adds sexual orientation, gender identity and expression to the list of protected legal classes. Across the country, these types of laws have forced people out of business for refusing to promote activities that run contrary to their beliefs.

The mayor explained that he originally vetoed the resolution because it would force business owners to provide goods and services for causes that they fundamentally disagree with and it would lead to a violation of constitutional rights with regard to free speech and religious liberty.

They’re going to have to compromise their faith AND THEY’RE going to have to do it or theY’RE going to be sued.

He cited dozens of cases across the country in which Christian bakers and others were forced to explicitly decorate cakes and banners with messages that violate their moral beliefs. Videographers, t-shirt designers and artists of all stripes, he said, would also be forced to actively use their talents to create messages that run contrary to their deeply held convictions.

“It allows a legal means by which one group can use to persecute those who they disagree with. It would amount to forced governmental artistic expression,” Dial said. He added that citizens do not give up their religious liberties by simply operating in the public marketplace.

“This resolution was about moving discrimination around,” Dial continued. “Transferring it from one group to another, because government was making a moral decision that one group’s rights was more important that the others.”

Dial ended his address by noting that he had hoped the Assembly would come back with a different resolution that respected the rights of all citizens.

“You could prove me wrong, but I don’t think it’s going to happen tonight,” he said. “The only way you can give this group the protections they want is to take way the rights of business owners to say no and sometimes that is going to be to some very offensive things. They’re going to have to compromise their faith and they’re going to have to do it or they’re going to be sued.”

Ketchikan Borough Assembly members.

Ultimately the Assembly voted 5-2 to override the mayor with Assembly members David Landis, Austin Otos, Sven Westergard, Amanda Pierce (who is running for reelection on Oct. 6) and Felix Wong all voting in favor. Susan Pickrell and Alan Bailey were the only ones to oppose overriding the mayor’s veto. Following the override, the resolution will now be submitted to the Alaska Legislature for their consideration.

An extended public comment period preceded the vote with arguments on both sides. At one point Sheen Davis, a self-described transgender woman, testified on behalf of the Ketchikan Pride Alliance. Davis urged the Assembly to override the mayor in order that Ketchikan could be a more inclusive community.

Following Davis’ remarks, the mayor asked him if whether a Christian artist should be forced to create something that explicitly violates his conscience. Davis would not answer the question except to say that he personally “would treat everybody the way I would want to be treated. That’s the only way I know how to answer that.”

Local resident Jeff White spoke against the resolution a few minutes later, stating that citizens have the right to operate businesses in the public square without having to violate their conscience.

“Nobody should ever be forbidden to walk into any public area and purchase items,” White told the Assembly. “But when it comes to forcing and individual to use their skills, their gifts, their creative hands, their artistic abilities to celebrate something that violates their own conscience, that’s where you have to draw the line.”

Everybody loses if this thing goes forward.

White argued that the proposed resolution is asking the state to take fundamental rights away from everyone. If the law was applied equally, he said, a Christian could force an atheist carpenter to build a church against the atheist’s will.

“It takes the rights away from everyone.”

“I can bring him to court,” White said. “I can make him – compel him to do it or pay the price. That’s not right … Everybody loses if this thing goes forward.”

To date, Anchorage, Sitka, Juneau, Bethel and the City of Ketchikan (not the borough) have adopted LGBTQ nondiscrimination policies but the Alaska Legislature has not imposed a statewide law.


Click here to contact members of the Ketchikan Borough Assembly.

Ketchikan Assembly dismisses religious freedom concerns, overrides mayor’s veto

Joel Davidson
Joel is Editor-in-Chief of the Alaska Watchman. Joel is an award winning journalist and has been reporting for over 24 years, He is a proud father of 8 children, and lives in Palmer, Alaska.


  • Kris says:

    Can someone please help me understand…what happened to Constitutionally guaranteed freedom of speech?? And freedom of religion?? Homosexuality is NOT an ethnic group. No godly Christian would discriminate against another human being based on their ethnicity. God made Adam and from Adam comes the whole human race. But the beliefs and practices of any human being when it comes down to morality is an entirely different matter. If a Christian walks into a bakery owned by someone who practices witchcraft and asks for a Christmas cake celebrating the birth of Christ with a scripture verse on it…would the cake maker object? Sure they could. As a private business owner, they can –for the most part–have any policy they like. But there are gobs of places where someone can get a cake and it’s no big deal to go elsewhere. If someone wants to wear a t-shirt that says Satan rules…go right ahead. If someone wants to wear a t-shirt with John 3:16 on it–Go right ahead! This article addresses something very overtly biased silencing one group and only allowing one side to be heard. Dangerous precident, but of course the Assembly doesn’t give a wit. They must bee very afraid of Truth!

  • susanne bolin says:

    Our Constitution says ” with equality for all and special priviliges for none “. People should not be forced to go against there religion and beliefs.

  • Steven says:

    Sheen is a woman, Joel.

  • Donald McCullough says:

    I am a Vietnam Veteran and this kind of cancer is spreading throughout our great land. Will we soon be forced to talk to a salesman at our door, whether it be someone selling brushes, religion or painting our house? Can we just say no thank you or will be sued for whatever the council has voted to be ‘the law’? This is not what I fought for, I am proud to be an American and will defend the constitution with arms if necessary here at home in the Last Frontier. Get out and vote, in person if possible; and let’s get rid of these politicians stomping all over our rights. Let’s make America Great Again!