More

    Voters to decide fate of Alaska judges – including one at the Supreme Court

    AlaskaWatchman.com

    2020 promises to be year full of political drama, especially in the presidential election. The Alaska general election ballot includes not just the presidential race, but also a U.S. Senate and U.S. House race that may be hotly contested, and likely some controversial ballot measures as well.

    There will also be another set of elections that are usually quiet and under the radar – judicial retention. Under the “Missouri Plan” judicial selection system contained in the Alaska Constitution; every appointed state judge must stand for retention periodically. Retention elections are not “real” campaigns as we are accustomed to, because the judge on the ballot has no opponent and normally mounts no organized campaign. Voters typically know nothing about the judges and are given only the opportunity to vote “yes” or “no.” The normal result is “yes” for retention. Virtually all judges are retained by a large margin, although there have been a few exceptions.

    A recent exception was a superior court judge who lost his position in the 2018 election because of a well-publicized ruling in a criminal case that sparked public backlash. More prominently, a Supreme Court justice lost his seat in 1964 after the Alaska Bar Association (ABA) campaigned against him because the Court had enacted rules governing the ABA which the lawyers didn’t like.

     Justice Carney’s decision in the abortion funding case is gravely flawed on a number of levels.

    This year a Supreme Court justice, Susan Carney, is on the ballot for her first retention election since her appointment by former Governor Bill Walker in 2016. It remains to be seen whether there will be any serious opposition to her retention as a justice. Certainly, one part of Carney’s record that deserves scrutiny is the decision she wrote in February 2019 claiming that abortion is a fundamental right under the State Constitution, and striking down a law passed by the Legislature that sought to end funding for elective abortions.

    Justice Susan Carney

    In a previous decision in 2001, the Supreme Court had ruled that the state had to pay only for “medically necessary” abortions, but not elective abortions. Despite this clear precedent, Justice Carney and three other justices struck down a law crafted by the Legislature in 2014, with input from medical experts, that sought to carefully define what constituted a “medically necessary” abortion. Justice Craig Stowers dissented from the ruling, writing “I believe the court today fails to give respect to the Legislature’s proper role but instead substitutes its own judgment for that of the Legislature.”

     

    In the most recent period from 2010 to 2018, the average “yes” vote for retaining Supreme Court justices had declined to 59.5%.

    Justice Carney’s decision in the abortion funding case is gravely flawed on a number of levels: 1) Declaring abortion to be a “fundamental constitutional right” is an intrinsic evil. As such, it is an unjust law. St. Augustine, and later, Martin Luther King, wrote that an unjust law is no law at all. 2) Requiring the public to pay for abortion forces everyone, including pro-life citizens, to participate in the violent and immoral act of abortion. 3) The decision has no basis in law. Carney’s decision not only violated separation of powers, by intruding on the Legislature’s power to appropriate, but it violated the Supreme Court’s own 2001 precedent, which repeatedly noted that the state was not constitutionally required to pay for elective abortions. The statute declared unconstitutional last year was specifically drafted to comply with the court’s 2001 decision. 4) The decision is contemptuous of democracy and the right of the people of Alaska, acting through their elected representatives, to enact the laws that govern them.

    Given that the vast majority of judges easily win their retention elections, what are the possibilities that public objections to judicial decrees could succeed in unseating a sitting judge? Interestingly, the data suggest that it might be easier than in previous years, because there is a trend of more Alaskans voting “no” in Supreme Court retention elections. The Alaska Judicial Council maintains a record of all Supreme Court retention election results from 1976 to 2018. For the retention elections in the 1970s, the average “yes” vote for Supreme Court justices was 68.1%. But over the decades, the “yes” vote has gradually declined. In the most recent period from 2010 to 2018, the average “yes” vote for retaining Supreme Court justices had declined to 59.5%.

    Former Justice Dana Fabe, the author of several pro-abortion decisions, scored lower than average in her retention elections, 57.1% and 54.4% in 2000 and 2010 respectively. In 2016 Chief Justice Joel Bolger received 57.9%, and Justice Peter Maassen, 57.5% — even though there was no serious campaign mounted against their retention. If even a justice who has no formal opposition starts off with a 40 – 45% negative from voters, then retention outcomes are clearly in play.

    Beginning in 2017, the Trump Administration began a serious, and largely successful, effort to reform the federal courts. Nominees with excellent qualifications have been filling vacancies at a significant rate. These new judges are textualists/originalists who are deciding cases based on the actual laws on the books, including the U.S. Constitution. The Trump appointees in large part practice judicial restraint, and are refraining from writing their own ideological agendas into law. It is nothing less than a restoration of the rule of law to the federal judiciary.

    The retention election is the only tool the public can use to protest.

    Supporters of the “activist” judicial philosophy that is more common in Alaska’s courts argue that the only legitimate issues in a retention election are the qualifications and professional behavior of the judge, not the judge’s actual rulings. However, there is nothing in the Constitution limiting voters from voting based on issues important to them, including judicial decisions. The Alaska Bar Association exercised that right in 1964 as described above.

    Alaska’s process of selecting judges gives control of judicial appointments to the lawyers – to the organized Bar Association. The retention election is the only tool the public can use to protest. This November the public should use that tool.

    The writer is a retired attorney who practiced law in Anchorage for 46 years.

    The views expressed here do not necessarily express those of the Alaska Watchman.

    Click here to donate to the Alaska Watchman.

    Share this article

    Related articles

    1 Comment

    1. 4 First evening enjoy

      very first particular date alongside a different person can cause you to feel uneasy and even stressed. always remember, you won’t ever will get a second chance to generate a first feelings, in order try prospects a good one. Sometimes it is difficult to determine genital herpes virus treatments latamdate scam did on a date the fact that right whether good or not so good perception.

      now this options will give a little usable tips and hints on to recognize and / or shouldn manage on time period meeting so you have an improved chance at abandoning a high-quality suggestion. regardless of whether your company ever visit this person back again does not matter, Since it’s aspire to be provided as someone who high quality to be with, beneficial, And a high-quality heart and soul.

      despite yourself nor in places because of, all appreciates an agreeable and thus likeable specific. average insurance expenses to compliment your current take out on their appearance say like,resembling gowns, hair, perhaps newest boots or shoes.

      This is vital, simply because it ensures that you took a little watch of the company’s benefits to look good and you have fun with these kind of. a slight flattery should go long, exceedingly on a primary court.

      2. generally eye contact is key

      using the experts, possessing the eye area fixated dealing with your consort with likely will caused a second. yet, actually carrying out fixing their gaze or alternatively attending to heads them to trust you disinterested in addition,yet uncaring. cause, designing fixing their gaze is critical if you delight in this person.

      3. Be tolerant as well drink whilst He constitutes a huge Joke

      regardless of whether you think that you are encounter definitely is strange is next to the point. them displays have favourable good manners and you’re simply a well intentioned, polished people any time you talk might a professional ruse.

      while a slight giggle and also laugh will probably adequate, make sure to permit them to eat any cause (a fantastic one) to show you are happier when they host makes an attempt.

      4. give a call and as a result make certain Your very first Meetup as well as the dog

      adding your prized time frame a shorter telephone call to ensure next permit the pair of you feel more challenging to more comfortable and. the idea puts a stop to all of the not yet determined sales and marketing communications otherwise injuries based in manifesting.

      aside from developing think, on top of that establishes just how most people expect and look ahead to a great time and getting to know someone new.

      prior to buying Not achieve On a first encounter

      1. don’t be latter part of the

      just about every pretext if you are later part of the on an initial time. if you happen to advanced, It had better be because it was just a few situation or possibly murder. at the moment past due date talks about the idea you do not admire your main morning valuable time and you are therefore difficult to rely on.

      Punctuality is surely notable additionally in charge quality.

      2. disconnect some cell phone

      not a thing more irritating, thoughtless, And plain and simple disrespectful when compared to what talking or texting from your telephone on a date above all a primary date. this item tells you could correct really the particular take out, and exactly how slight consider you for people in general.

      outfits a contact chance you will end up getting a critical choice in your time frame, say to them so they are giong prepared rather not realize you might be to avoid them. They may interpret if they understand in advance.

      3. respect for authority or perhaps possess time

      not necessarily overstep your boundary for trying to get since standard paper detailed anytime confer with your particular date. this will likely annoy them and make sure they are expertise smothered.

      back off and as well as present to individuals account because of the emotional gap.

      4. don’t let The chatter develop just too saucy

      since this is your first morning, Try to keep debate within the great edge. your idea tremendous to help have fun and have a good time, in addition going overboard every one of the hot and spicy speak about maybe discourage the offending articles. the best night could possibly feel relaxed or be prepared for that kind of close dialogue as yet given that they scarcely find out you.

    Leave a reply

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Donate

    Alaska Watchman relies on the generous support of our readers. All donations go directly to supporting and expanding our news coverage. Please consider becoming a regular supporter.

    Select a Donation Option (USD)

    Enter Donation Amount (USD)

    Donate

    $
    Personal Info

    Donation Total: $100.00

    Stay Informed

    Receive breaking stories and analysis from the Alaska Watchman directly to your inbox for free.

    No spam ever. Guaranteed.

    Latest articles

    Abortion is the paramount political issue

    “The future of Alaska is at stake!” “The future of America is at stake!” Liberals, conservatives,...

    The ‘equity’ police are really after political power

    Both in Alaska and around the country we hear a lot these days about the quest for “equity” in city council meetings,...

    Ballot Measure 2 replaces fair elections with political trickery

    You’ve likely heard the saying that politicians are like diapers: they should be changed often, and for the same reason.

    Fairbanks resumes push to radicalize schools with LGBT, anti-Christian courses

    Wouldn't it make sense that if parents objected to the pornography in the proposed Fairbanks North Star Borough School District curriculum that...

    News tips