Nearly 100 Mat-Su residents turned out for an explosive presentation accusing the Alaska Supreme Court of violating the constitutional rights of citizen grand juries. The Jan. 9 talk by longtime judicial watchdog David Haeg included a call for attendees to participate in a March 15 statewide courthouse sit-in to demand that the high court honor the constitution with regard to grand jury rights.

David Haeg speaks to a group of Mat-Su residents on Jan. 9 in Palmer.

Speaking at Real Life Church in Palmer, Haeg was introduced by organizer Edna DeVries, who hosts the weekly School of Government meetings. She also serves as mayor of the Mat-Su Borough.

For the next two hours, Haeg explained his decades-long struggle to fight judicial corruption in Alaska – a fight that is now coming to a head.

Haeg, who has spearheaded large and growing protests outside the Kenai Courthouse for much of the past year, explained that the Alaska Supreme Court recently issued an order, effective Dec. 1, 2022, which rewrites the official rules governing citizen grand jury rights. In particular, the new rules suspend the ability of grand juries to investigate and indict corrupt public officials, limits who they can indict, and suggests that their investigative authority does not extend to individual court cases or queries into why the Department of Law may have declined to prosecute particular cases.

As Haeg explained to the Mat-Su gathering, the changes were issued soon after a Kenai grand jury subpoenaed Alaska’s only judge investigator for the last 34 years, Marla Greenstein, who serves as executive director of the Alaska Commission on Judicial Conduct. The subpoena was issued this past summer.

Haeg pointed out that the new rules also prohibit citizens from directly appealing to grand juries for justice, which is one of the body’s main functions.

Haeg pointed out that Greenstein has conducted roughly 8,000 judge investigations over the past four decades, and he said he has strong evidence that she has falsified official investigations and certified documents to keep corrupt judges on the bench.

According to Haeg, the new grand jury rules from the Supreme Court appear to directly conflict with what Alaska’s Constitutional Convention delegates intended for grand juries when they stated,  “The power of grand juries to inquire into the willful misconduct in office of public officers, and to find indictments in connection therewith, shall never be suspended.”

In addition to curtailing grand jury investigative powers, Haeg pointed out that the new rules also prohibit citizens from directly appealing to grand juries for justice, which is one of the body’s main functions.

Instead, the new rules state: “Decisions as to what to present to the grand jury, including whether to present a matter requested by a citizen to the grand jury for investigation, rest with the executive branch. A grand jury has constitutional authority to investigate appropriate matters when properly presented. This, in itself, does not mean that an individual citizen has a right to present any matter directly to the grand jury for consideration.”

Yet, as Haeg, pointed out,  the original Alaska Grand Jury Handbook (pages  5 and 6) states: “Charges of crime may be brought to your attention in several ways: (4) by private citizens heard by the Grand Jury in formal session, with the Grand Jury’s consent. [A] citizen is at liberty to apply to the Grand Jury for permission to appear before it in order to suggest or urge that a certain situation should be investigated by it.”

Not only are the new rules, unconstitutional, Haeg said the manner in which they were imposed violates due process.

Haeg noted the obvious conflict of interest. If a grand jury must first get approval from judges and/or district attorneys, they will never be allowed to investigate these same officials if they become corrupt.

Haeg claimed that the new rules also violate Alaska Statute, which states, “If an individual grand juror knows or has reason to believe that a crime has been committed that is triable by the court, the juror shall disclose it to the other jurors, who shall investigate it.”

Not only are the new rules, unconstitutional, Haeg said the manner in which they were imposed violates due process.

Changes to grand jury rules are supposed to happen in consultation with the Supreme Court’s 13-member Criminal Rules Committee. This, however, did not really occur. Instead, committee members were merely informed that the Supreme Court wanted to make the changes.

When told of the pending changes, only three of the 13 Rule Committee members had time to respond. Two of them told the Supreme Court “the full committee should consider the proposed changes at a meeting” because of a concern that “the rule changes were important and serious changes of a constitutional nature and should not be rushed through.”

Despite this warning, the Supreme Court approved the changes on Nov. 29, 2022, without holding a single Rules Committee meeting, even though a meeting had already been scheduled for December 16 – just 18 days later.

In a recent letter to the Kenai grand jury, Haeg said that the main purpose in rushing the rule change was to “suspend your power to recommend or indict before you are finished with your investigation.”

Additionally, Haeg pointed out that the plan to alter the rules was already well underway back in August, when Alaska Supreme Court Justice Daniel Winfree sent a letter to Attorney General Treg Taylor to work out the details of the changes without involving the Rules Committtee.

“Why was the Rules Committee (who is supposed to change the rules) never notified until just before the Supreme Court passed the change in late November?” Haeg asked the Kenai grand jury.

On Jan. 12, Haeg sent a separate email to fellow citizens who are concerned about the recent actions of the Supreme Court. He asked these supporters to write directly to the Kenai grand jury and to encourage them to continue their investigations, including expanding their investigation to learn why the Alaska Supreme Court unconstitutionally altered the rules governing grand juries.

“This may be the single most effective thing anyone can do – for it will let the Kenai grand jury know that We-The-People have their back,” Haeg’s email states. “And let the Alaska Supreme Court know their unconstitutional suspension of Grand Jury powers is unacceptable.”


— Click here to learn more about this issue, join the Alaskans For Constitutional Rights (AFCR) Zoom meeting every Thursday at 6:30 PM. Zoom ID: 867-7762-7962. Passcode: 1776. You can also attend the Alaska Grand Jurors Association Zoom meeting every Saturday night at 8 PM. Zoom ID: 821-4574-5893 Passcode: 693100.

— Click here to add your signature to a letter urging the Kenai grand jury to continue its current investigation.

— Click here to watch the full two-hour presentation delivered by David Haeg on Jan. 9.

Click here to support Alaska Watchman reporting.

Alaskans urged to protest against Supreme Court’s violation of citizen grand jury rights

Joel Davidson
Joel is Editor-in-Chief of the Alaska Watchman. Joel is an award winning journalist and has been reporting for over 24 years, He is a proud father of 8 children, and lives in Palmer, Alaska.


  • Neil DeWitt says:

    Interesting topic! I guess time will tell what becomes of this! Everyone knows our Alaska Supreme Court is corrupt. Now to prove it will be a nail in their coffins.

  • Friend of Humanity says:

    Joel, thank you so much for writing about this and publishing the information about the meetings so that people can attend!

  • Friend of Humanity says:

    Rumble is an alternative platform that has the presentation by David Haeg. The video can be found here:

  • Ray Southwell says:

    Take note along with the Kenai Grand Jury was Thomas Garber’s attempt for an Anchorage Grand Jury to expose the broad failures of Office of Children’s Services. (OCS)

    For months Garber had been going before Judge Morse (Presiding Judge of the Third Judicial District) asking for a grand jury to take testimony concerning the corrupt behavior of OCS.

    Judge Morse understood he could not keep Thomas Garber from going before a grand jury.

    Thomas had prepared an excellent presentation for Judge Morse for a hearing last December 14. Thomas Garber was teady for action.

    The Supreme Court change in the rules of the game just 14 days before the hearing. This allowed Judge Morse to vacate the hearing. Thomas is appealing Judge Morse’s decision.

  • Ray Southwell says:

    Consider this. Every middle school student understands our three branches of government. All with separate powers from each other.

    Judges have “Rules of Judicial Conduct. “ (See attached)

    Cannon #1 states:

    “A Judge Shall Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary.”

    It is documented the Supremes went to the Executive Branch of government to get direction on the rule changes.

    As we all learned in 8th grade civics class the three branches of government must be separate.

    The justices violated their judicial rules of Independence.

    I will also add the executive branch appointed Deputy Attorney General John Skidmore to help rewrite the rules. Separation of powers and independent judges all gone.

    John Skidmore previous government job was as Criminal Division Director. It is documented Skidmore convince Kenai Court Judge Wells to keep me from bringing evidence to my grand jury I was serving on in 2018.

    A violation of my responsibility and right as a serving grand juror.

  • Dave says:

    All court orders arising from the Third Judicial District are defective. See Gladden vs. Reigh 3:19-cv-99. Despite ‘Judge’ Sharon Gleason’s rush to aid her beleaguered bar sister the cat is out of the bag this time.

  • Friend of Humanity says:

    Fantastic interview at SGT Report with Karen Kingston and James Tracy on the jabs and on law. Really good reminders about the power of the People!

  • CD says:

    Thank you, David Haeg!